ARSA RSS Feed ARSA LinkedIn
Contact Us Online Portal

FAA Adopts ARSA’s Recommendations in New Order

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released Order 8300.14, Repair Specification Approval Process, which defines the responsibilities of FAA personnel and designees in approving specifications for major repairs. Repair specifications are repairs developed by maintenance providers that are not covered by maintenance data available from the manufacturer. The Order defines the procedures for FAA review of repair specifications and what is expected from applicants.

It incorporates many of the suggestions presented by ARSA in a letter to the FAA. That letter requested that the agency create comprehensive guidance for repair stations that develop their own maintenance processes (repair specifications).

The new Order delineates the different responsibilities of applicants, local Flight Standards District Offices (FSDOs), the Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) and Designated Engineering Representatives (DER) during the development, review and approval process.

Once an applicant (most likely a repair station) determines a repair specification is appropriate, it must develop the data necessary to substantiate the repair and submit it to the local FSDO for review. The FSDO must review the application and coordinate with the ACO for technical review and approval of the substantiation data. The FSDO does not coordinate with the ACO however, if the repair station uses an appropriately rated DER to approve the technical data. When the data has been approved by the FAA through either the ACO or DER, the FSDO must then evaluate the repair station’s capabilities to perform the repair appropriately. The FSDO must determine that the repair station has the appropriate housing, facilities, equipment and personnel. If the FSDO determines that the capabilities exist to make repairs in accordance with the specification, the Aviation Safety Inspector will sign the repair specification and add it to the repair station’s Operations Specifications.

ARSA is encouraged that the FAA incorporated many of its suggestions into the final Order. The agency did stop short of allowing repair stations to develop similar alteration specifications and, in addition, failed to implement specific timelines for the review and approval process as ARSA suggested.

A copy of ARSA’s letter may be found here.



More from ARSA

Good as Gold

Sponsors | Registration | Information March 10-13, 2020 (Add to Outlook Calendar) Washington, D.C. & Arlington, Virginia ARSA is grateful to its 2020 Annual Conference Gold Sponsors. Each company’s support…Read More

ARSA Member Survey Distributed

ARSA’s annual member survey invitation has been sent to the email address of every primary contact. The message is subjected “ARSA Member Survey Invitation” and was sent from arsa@arsa.org with…Read More

ARSA Leads Industry Letter to Repair FAA-TCCA MIP

On Feb. 3, ARSA led an international coalition of 13 U.S. and Canadian aviation associations to deliver a letter to Transport Canada Civil Aviation and the FAA raising two issues…Read More

GAO Workforce Report Can Be Resource for Industry

On Feb. 6, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released the first in a series of reports mandated by the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 to study aviation industry and agency…Read More

ARSA Urges Swift FAA Action on Workforce Priorities at House Hearing

In a statement submitted for the record for a Feb. 11 House Aviation Subcommittee hearing on aviation workforce issues, ARSA called on Congress to apply more pressure to the FAA…Read More
ARSA