ARSA RSS Feed ARSA LinkedIn
Contact Us Payment Portal

ARSA Condemns FAA’s Rulemaking by Fiat

Update – Aug. 28, 2015: The FAA issued a second SNPRM soliciting comments on agency-provided supporting documentation. While the association did not submit specific comments on the second SNPRM, it maintains that the agency is required to support its rulemaking with verifiable technical data, which it has thus far failed to do.


On Feb. 23, ARSA continued its opposition to the FAA’s flagrant disregard of basic requirements for promulgating regulations. The neglect of its responsibilities is particularly troublesome when unsafe conditions are alleged. The association again requested the immediate withdrawal of the proposed rulemaking.

The proposed Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires a phased replacement of cylinders used on certain engines manufactured by Continental Motors, Inc. ARSA’s comments point out the FAA continued to ignored its statutory duties under the Administrative Procedure Act and Data Quality Act, as well as the agency’s own internal guidance for satisfying those obligations.

“The FAA has completely failed to provide the substantive basis for the rule or explain why such a factually deficient administrative record supports the issuance of a far reaching safety directive,” said Ryan Poteet, ARSA’s regulatory affairs manager. “The agency was asked to provide the data on which it relies, but instead has doubled down and pushed through without supporting information. It seems to think that it can pass a rule simply by saying it can pass a rule.”

ARSA’s comments detail how the FAA’s failure to comply with its statutory obligations has stymied public participation, the lynchpin to rulemaking. Commenters are forced to speculate on the agency’s justifications and to provide every reasonable explanation for why the rule should not be issued. The failure to provide supporting data not only makes it impossible for the public to engage in the rulemaking process, it demonstrates that the agency has failed to consider all relevant evidence required to reach an informed, well-reasoned conclusion.

“In a heavily regulated industry, all certificate holders are negatively impacted when a government agency ignores the law,” Poteet said. “The FAA cannot be allowed to issue the most important type of safety rule, an AD, based on nothing more than speculation and conjecture; it must be reminded that it cannot regulate by fiat.”

ARSA’s comments are available at http://arsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ARSA-Comments_to_SNPRM-FAA-2012-0002-20150-20150223.pdf.



More from ARSA

SLC 2017 – See What Happened

See what happened when the maintenance community “engaged for effect” in the American capital: Online: arsa.org/slc-2017 (This Page) Twitter: @ARSAWorks, @caaklein, @LevantoAir and #AVMROSLC17 Digital Companion for Participants (Password Protected): arsa.org/slc-materials-2017 What…Read More

AerSale’s Barimo Brings Leadership, Technical Expertise to ARSA Presidency

Photo courtesy AerSale. Click to see Barimo’s company bio. The ARSA board of directors has announced the election of its new president: Basil Barimo, chief operating officer of AerSale, an…Read More

SLC 2017 – Thanks to CRT

Component Repair Technologies & A Moment of Calm Special thanks to Component Repair Technologies for its Gold Level Sponsorship of ARSA’s 2017 Strategic Leadership Conference in Washington, D.C. this week. As participants take on…Read More

SLC 2017 – Thanks to AAR

AAR, Early Rising & a White House Briefing Special thanks to AAR Corp. for its Gold Level Sponsorship of ARSA’s 2017 Strategic Leadership Conference in Washington, D.C. this week. The company’s support will put…Read More

New ARSA Guidance Clarifies Duty-Free Aviation Parts Importation Rules

ARSA has released new guidance aimed at helping the aviation maintenance industry import parts for repair in order to more efficiently do business internationally. Under U.S. law and international agreements,…Read More
ARSA