ARSA RSS Feed ARSA LinkedIn
Ask ARSA Online Portal

Approval Only Needed Once!

On February 23, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued its final response to a Customer Service Initiative (CSI) request filed by ARSA on behalf of Erickson Air-Crane nearly six years ago (the program is now known as the Consistency and Standardization Initiative). The FAA’s CSI letter addresses the relationship between technical data (i.e., engineering information) on the one hand, and methods, techniques and practices for performing maintenance and alterations on the other.

Concurring with ARSA’s interpretation of the pertinent rules, the FAA concluded that the “how-to” instructions for performing maintenance and alterations contained in manufacturer’s manuals is already supported by approved technical data when such approval is required under sections 65.95(d)(1), 121.379(b), 135.437(b) and 145.201(c) (i.e., when performing major repairs and alterations). Because the technical data was approved under the design change procedures of part 21 there is no need to have the data re-approved via a field approval (block 3 of a Form 337), DER approval (Form 8110-3) or approval by another authorized designee. The FAA’s decision applies to thousands of existing manufacturers’ maintenance and overhaul manuals including Structural Repair Manuals, Aircraft Maintenance Manuals, Engine and Propeller Maintenance Manuals and Component Maintenance Manuals.

The FAA also acknowledged the fact that a Structural Repair Manual (SRM) that has been FAA-approved is of no particular significance for purposes of complying with sections 65.95(d)(1), 121.379(b), 135.437(b) and 145.201(c) since in the absence of special circumstances such as an Airworthiness Directive or Airworthiness Limitations, there is no requirement for a maintenance manual to be FAA-approved. In summary, these regulations require that the technical data be approved when performing a major repair or alteration and this requirement is fulfilled by following the methods, techniques and practices contained in the pertinent SRM or other manufacturer’s manual regardless whether the manual itself has been FAA-approved.

The FAA’s response may be found here.



More from ARSA

How’s Marshall?

On July 8, ARSA Managing Director & General Counsel Marshall S. Filler underwent successful heart surgery. He is recovering at home and is on track to continue his passion as…Read More

FAA to Restart Global Leadership Meeting

On July 20, the FAA announced plans to host its 8th Annual Global Leadership Meeting in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 22-23. The event will have both in-person and online attendance…Read More

Lawmakers Explore Aviation Workforce Diversity

The House Aviation Subcommittee held a hearing July 20 to discuss enhancing diversity in the aviation workforce. The witnesses were (click a name to download their written testimony): Rebecca Lutte,…Read More

Unpacking AD Authority

On July 2, ARSA requested clarification of the FAA’s authority to issue an Airworthiness Directive, questioning the April 22 posting of an AD against certain Uninsured United Parachute Technologies, LLC…Read More

Training – Parts Documentation Under the U.S.-EU MAG

To see all of ARSA’s work on the MAG, visit arsa.org/mag. For years, ARSA lead an industry wide effort to “smooth” implementation of parts documentation issues in the U.S.-EU Maintenance Annex…Read More
ARSA