On June 14, ARSA submitted comments to the FAA’s “proposed” interpretation of duty and rest provisions for maintenance personnel. The agency’s new position effectively eliminates the language in 14 CFR § 121.377 that requires one day off during any seven consecutive days “or the equivalent thereof within any one calendar month”.
Although characterized as a proposal, the FAA had previously issued the interpretation on May 18, 2010. In fact, the FAA’s stated basis for requesting comments was ARSA’s December 13, 2010 letter calling for withdrawal of the new interpretation.
ARSA’s letter noted that the interpretation conflicted with earlier FAA interpretations, long-standing policy and the plain language of the existing rule. The association noted that the new interpretation was, in effect, rulemaking without public notice and comment required by the Administrative Procedure Act. The FAA responded that it would not withdraw the interpretation, but would instead seek comments before deciding to modify or rescind the May 18 interpretation.
ARSA’s latest comments point out that the FAA’s interpretation impermissibly creates a de facto new duty time regulation under the cover of interpreting an existing rule, and therefore circumvents the rulemaking process. As a result, the association again asks for withdrawal of the May 18 interpretation.
~~~ posted 06/17/11 ~~~
