ARSA has submitted its final comments on the FAA’s proposed changes to 14 CFR part 145. While the Association commented extensively on all areas of the proposed rule, those of special concern included ambiguous reasons for denying a repair station certificate, a need to clarify the new rating system and capability list requirements, the creation of an undefined “chief inspector” personnel requirement and allowing repair stations to use their own quality systems when working for an air carrier or commercial operation. Look for a complete summary of all our comments and suggestions for improvements on the proposed rule in the next issue of the hotline. To view ARSA’s comments click on this attachment.
On Oct. 4, ARSA joined Aircraft Electronics Association and Airlines for America in confirming for the FAA that new foreign oversight mandates from Congress’ reauthorization law are easily met through…
Read More
Researchers from the U.S. Government Accountability Office are auditing the FAA’s requirement that certificate holders waive the right to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) to obtain a settlement…
Read More
On Oct. 1, the Maintenance Implementation Procedures (MIP) between the United States and Brazil entered into force. The FAA confirmed the agreement’s status in a Sept. 30 Information for Operators…
Read More
On Sept. 26, ARSA commented on the FAA’s second Federal Register notice regarding its assessment of the paperwork burden associated with FAA requirements for repair station certificate applications. In general,…
Read More
On Sept. 19, the Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC) released its 2024 Pipeline Report. The report’s analysis was performed by Oliver Wyman Vector, which also produces ARSA’s Annual Market Assessment,…
Read More
