Join ARSA Ask ARSA Pay ARSA

The Future is Here for AFS & AIR

On March 5, the Federal Register published the FAA’s final rule on the functional reorganizations of both the Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) and Flight Standards Service (AFS). The rule is the result of ongoing efforts by each organization involving both government personnel as well as ARSA and other industry stakeholders.

Attendees at the 2018 Annual Repair Symposium will get updates from the agency on each initiative:

AIR Transformation

As part of a longer-term strategy, AIR underwent a “holistic” process to review, update and improve its certification strategy, management systems and organization to realign into a functional structure.

Future of Flight Standards Initiative

As part of a larger effort to overhaul culture and improve efficiency/responsiveness, AFS reorganized into function-based structure (rather than geography):

  • Four directors.
  • Eight deputy directors.
  • Twenty-eight division managers.
    • Regional structure replaced by four functional organizations: Air Carrier, General Aviation, Standards, and Foundational Business.

To review the final rule, follow the link below to the Federal Register:

Final Rule: Aviation Safety Organization Changes
Published: 03/05/2018
Docket #: FAA-2018-0119
Effective date: 03/05/2018

The FAA Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) and Flight Standards Service (AFS) have reorganized to align with functional organization design concepts. The AIR reorganization included eliminating product directorates and restructuring and re-designating field offices. The AFS reorganization included eliminating geographic regions, realigning headquarters organizations, and restructuring field offices. Currently, various rules in the Code of Federal Regulations refer to specific AIR and AFS offices that are obsolete after the reorganizations. This rule replaces specific references with generic references not dependent on any particular office structure. This rule does not impose any new obligations and is only intended to eliminate any confusion about with whom regulated entities and other persons should interact when complying with these various rules in the future.



More from ARSA

FAA Acknowledges Repair Station Paperwork Burden

On Sept. 26, ARSA commented on the FAA’s second Federal Register notice regarding its assessment of the paperwork burden associated with FAA requirements for repair station certificate applications. In general,…Read More

Maintenance Educators Update Congress on Talent Pipeline

On Sept. 19, the Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC) released its 2024 Pipeline Report. The report’s analysis was performed by Oliver Wyman Vector, which also produces ARSA’s Annual Market Assessment,…Read More

Technical Industries Push U.S. Congress for Workforce Funding

On Sept. 12, ARSA joined nearly 130 organizations across multiple industries and academia in urging U.S. congressional leaders to fully fund federal workforce programs. “Employers are already facing workforce challenges.…Read More

Experiencing FAA Misunderstanding of Rulemaking Communications

On Aug. 22, ARSA offered to help the Office of the FAA’s Chief Counsel correct misunderstanding of ex parte communications during active rulemaking. Such engagement is a method of ensuring…Read More

FAA Releases Limited-function Repair Station Directory

In August, ARSA tested the FAA’s new searchable directory of certificated repair stations. The system, which has been integrated to include all part 141, 142, and 147 in addition to…Read More
ARSA