On April 28 at 2:30 p.m., the Senate Aviation Operations, Safety, and Security Subcommittee will hold its fourth hearing this month as it prepares to draft the next FAA reauthorization…Read More
ARSA Works – Contract Maintenance Requirements Comparisons & Timeline
On March 4, the FAA unveiled a congressionally-mandated rule on air carrier contract maintenance requirements. The association has been engaged for years on Capitol Hill and with regulators to mitigate the rule’s impact on repair stations and their airline customers.
The following resources have been produced to assist industry members in interpreting the new rule and understanding its development:
- Comparison between the proposed and final rule.
- Comparison of Sec. 310, FAA Reauthorization Act (H.R. 915) and Sec. 319, FAA Modernization & Reform Act (as enacted).
- Contract Maintenance Requirements Timeline (from Dec. 1997 to Mar. 2015).
To see all of the ways ARSA is working on behalf of the aviation maintenance industry, please visit the ARSA Works page. For more reference material and compliance information, visit the association’s resource page.
Previously from ARSA
March 5, 2015
On March 4, the FAA unveiled a congressionally-mandated rule on air carrier contract maintenance requirements.
The action was commanded by the FAA Modernization & Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95 (February 14, 2012)). While unnecessary, Congress was compelled to “do something” about Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General reports (2003, 2005, 2008) criticizing the FAA’s oversight of air carriers’ contract maintenance programs.
ARSA’s actions on the legislative and regulatory fronts have ensured minimal disruption to airlines and repair stations. Beginning with recommending legislative language (and successfully lobbying to enact it), the association then worked with its airline colleagues and the FAA on parallel changes to OpSpec D091. Finally, when the mandated rule was proposed, ARSA comments helped the FAA adhere to congressional intent and the statute’s plain-language.
The work ARSA did on your behalf ensured this government regulation will have a minimal impact.
March 4, 2015
ARSA will be working with its airline colleagues to ensure a smooth transition is achieved. The association’s 2013 comments to the notice of proposed rulemaking can be found here.
November 14, 2012
On Nov. 13, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the relationship between contract maintenance providers and air carriers that operate aircraft with 10 or more seats.
The proposal is a direct result of congressional action. Sec. 319 of the FAA Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2012 (enacted on February 14, 2012) mandated the FAA to issue regulations regarding who may perform “covered work” on aircraft used to provide air transportation. ARSA aggressively lobbied Congress on the provision to ensure effective oversight of maintenance providers without undermining the efficiency of the industry.
The NPRM would require operators to develop policies, procedures, methods, and instructions for performing contract maintenance, and to include them in their maintenance manuals. This would ensure that operators are able to maintain consistent control and oversight over the maintenance of their aircraft. While the reauthorization law only referenced part 121 air carriers, the rulemaking would expand the same requirements to include part 135 operators of aircraft with 10 or more seats.
Recognizing that repair stations have faced difficulty gaining consistent access to the relevant portions of a carrier’s manual, the proposed regulation requires air carriers or commercial operators to provide the repair station performing work with the applicable portions of its maintenance manual. This remains consistent with the air carriers’ retaining primary responsibility for aircraft and supports the concept that the provider is an extension of the air carriers’ maintenance program when a repair station performs work.
The proposed rule would define “maintenance provider” to avoid the confusion between certificated and non-certificated personnel, and would define a maintenance provider as “any person who performs maintenance, preventive maintenance, or an alteration for a certificate holder other than a person who is trained by and employed directly by that certificate holder.”
Finally, the proposed rulemaking mandates that part 121 and 135 operators maintain a complete and comprehensive list of each party with which it contracts maintenance and a description of the work performed. Such a catalog is intended to help the FAA allocate oversight resources as appropriate, ensuring a risk based inspection regime that does not hinder repair station efficiency.
The Association will be closely reviewing the rule over the coming weeks to ensure that the proposal is free of any unintended consequences. These new regulations would take effect one year after the publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
For a document comparing Sec. 319 of the FAA Modernization & Reform Act to the NPRM, please click here.
ARSA strongly encourages all repair stations to closely review the proposed regulations and submit comments before the
February 11, 2013 deadline March 13, 2013.
~~ Updated 2/12/2013: New comment deadline ~~
More from ARSA
From April 14-16, Miami was the center of the aviation maintenance world. On the exhibit floor and in the lecture halls, ARSA was there.
Vice President of Operations Crystal Maguire…
The association was recently contacted by Mr. Hussain Alhallaf, a Ph.D. candidate at Florida Institute of Technology’s doctoral program in Aviation Sciences in the College of Aeronautics. Mr. Alhallaf is examining aviation…Read More
The association’s annual member survey is in your primary contact’s inbox. This is your opportunity to contribute to ARSA’s work on behalf of the industry.
This year’s survey is supplemented by…
As American’s submitted their annual tax returns to the Internal Revenue Service, ARSA outlined the aviation maintenance industry’s tax reform priorities.
In comments to the Senate Finance Committee’s Business Income Tax and…