Join ARSA Ask ARSA Pay ARSA

FAA Officially Withdraws Memo Incorrectly Defining ‘Engine Influencing Parts’

On Dec. 19, ARSA received a letter from Susan Cabler, acting manager of the FAA’s Design, Manufacturing & Airworthiness Division (AIR-100), announcing the withdrawal of FAA Policy Memorandum AIR100-16-160-PM09.

The announcement came in response to an Oct. 14 request jointly submitted by ARSA and Airlines for America (A4A) to the agency. That original letter noted the memo erroneously relied on Advisory Circular 33.70-1 to define “engine influencing parts.” Cabler’s response was light on details, but noted the FAA will continue to coordinate future policy regarding additive manufacturing – the subject of the memo in question –  meaning that maintenance providers must remain attentive to continued attempts to constrain parts production.

To read the response letter, click here.

For information on ARSA and A4A’s initial request, review the content below.

For information on a legislative effort joined by a number of aviation associations to prevent Congressional incursion into parts markets, click here.

Previously from ARSA...

11/1/16 - (UPDATED) ARSA, A4A Remind FAA It's Never Defined 'Engine Influencing Parts'

November 1, 2016

UPDATE: The FAA has withdrawn Policy Memorandum AIR100-16-160-PM09. Although no reason has yet been specified by the agency, the association is hopeful it was because of the joint request filed by ARSA and A4A on Oct. 14 (see below).


Oct. 17, 2016

On Oct. 14, ARSA and Airlines for America (A4A) jointly requested the withdrawal of FAA Policy Memorandum AIR100-16-160-PM09 because it erroneously relied on Advisory Circular 33.70-1 to define “engine influencing parts.”

Despite the memo’s contention to the contrary, the term does not appear any of the agency’s guidance nor 14 CFR part 33. The associations’ request further noted that the FAA’s issuance of the policy memorandum conflicted with the agency’s document release procedures and should likewise be withdrawn. Both organizations emphasized the agency should not impose any additional requirements for influencing parts without specific regulatory authority or public comment.

To read the full ARSA/A4A submission, click here.

To see all the ways ARSA works on behalf of the aviation maintenance community, visit the ARSA Works page.



More from ARSA

ARSA Pushes Congress to Guarantee FAA Funding

On Dec. 17, ARSA delivered a letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure (T&I) supporting the Aviation Funding Solvency…Read More

Support Simplifying New D&A Rules

Dec. 22, 2025 Update: ARSA is developing compliance matrices for tracking requirements of both 14 CFR part 120 and 49 CFR part 40 against international laws. The association is working…Read More

ARSA & AEA Release SMS Guidance for U.S. Repair Stations

On Dec. 18, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) jointly released and industry advisory for U.S. repair stations holding EASA approval under the U.S./EU bilateral aviation safety agreement needing…Read More

Canadian Compliance Matrix Updated Ahead of New MIP’s Effective Date

On Sept. 9, the FAA and Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) released revision 2 of the Maintenance Implementation Procedures (MIP) issued under the bilateral aviation safety agreement between the United…Read More

SMS Integration Webinar Series Continues Jan. 20

On Dec. 16, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association presented the third of six planned webinars – a monthly series stretching into March 2026 – explaining effective integration of a…Read More
ARSA