Join ARSA Ask ARSA Pay ARSA

ARSA Condemns FAA’s Rulemaking by Fiat

Update – Aug. 28, 2015: The FAA issued a second SNPRM soliciting comments on agency-provided supporting documentation. While the association did not submit specific comments on the second SNPRM, it maintains that the agency is required to support its rulemaking with verifiable technical data, which it has thus far failed to do.


On Feb. 23, ARSA continued its opposition to the FAA’s flagrant disregard of basic requirements for promulgating regulations. The neglect of its responsibilities is particularly troublesome when unsafe conditions are alleged. The association again requested the immediate withdrawal of the proposed rulemaking.

The proposed Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires a phased replacement of cylinders used on certain engines manufactured by Continental Motors, Inc. ARSA’s comments point out the FAA continued to ignored its statutory duties under the Administrative Procedure Act and Data Quality Act, as well as the agency’s own internal guidance for satisfying those obligations.

“The FAA has completely failed to provide the substantive basis for the rule or explain why such a factually deficient administrative record supports the issuance of a far reaching safety directive,” said Ryan Poteet, ARSA’s regulatory affairs manager. “The agency was asked to provide the data on which it relies, but instead has doubled down and pushed through without supporting information. It seems to think that it can pass a rule simply by saying it can pass a rule.”

ARSA’s comments detail how the FAA’s failure to comply with its statutory obligations has stymied public participation, the lynchpin to rulemaking. Commenters are forced to speculate on the agency’s justifications and to provide every reasonable explanation for why the rule should not be issued. The failure to provide supporting data not only makes it impossible for the public to engage in the rulemaking process, it demonstrates that the agency has failed to consider all relevant evidence required to reach an informed, well-reasoned conclusion.

“In a heavily regulated industry, all certificate holders are negatively impacted when a government agency ignores the law,” Poteet said. “The FAA cannot be allowed to issue the most important type of safety rule, an AD, based on nothing more than speculation and conjecture; it must be reminded that it cannot regulate by fiat.”

ARSA’s comments are available at http://arsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ARSA-Comments_to_SNPRM-FAA-2012-0002-20150-20150223.pdf.



More from ARSA

Review FAA’s Methods, Techniques, and Practices

The FAA has engaged industry to help review AC 43.13-1B Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices—Aircraft Inspection and Repair that is applicable to aircraft inspection and repair. The AC primarily supports…Read More

FAA/EASA MAG Change 10 Released

On June 20, ARSA learned of the publication of change 10 to the Maintenance Annex Guidance between the FAA and EASA, which is issued under bilateral agreement between the United…Read More

Drafting Regulatory Purpose into Order 8130.21

On June 17, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) jointly submitted a rewrite of the FAA’s Draft Order 8130.21J, “Completion of FAA Form 8130-3 under 14 CFR part 21.”…Read More

ARSA Leads D&A Action at EASA-FAA Conference

ARSA Executive Vice President Christian Klein joined global aviation regulators and industry leaders in Cologne the week of June 9 for the annual EASA-FAA Safety Conference. Klein attended to present…Read More

Correct STC Oversight Problems

STC holders should take advantage of summertime opportunities to highlight FAA oversight issues to government auditors. Congress’ May 2024 reauthorization of the FAA, required the Department of Transportation’s Office of Inspector…Read More
ARSA