Join ARSA Ask ARSA Pay ARSA

ARSA to White House: Government Should Trust Its Own Aviation Safety Approvals

On Nov. 17, ARSA submitted a document to the White House identifying an important opportunity for the Department of Defense (DoD) to enhance efficiency and reduce costs related to maintaining its fleet of commercial derivative aircraft (CDA).  The association’s white paper was sent to White House Director of Policy and Interagency Coordination Carlos Diaz-Rosillo as a follow-up to discussions with maintenance industry leaders during the 2017 ARSA Strategic Leadership Conference executive branch briefing.

ARSA’s position is the FAA, through its civil aviation oversight, already determines whether Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) parts and Designated Engineering Representative (DER) repairs are compliant and fit for use on the aircraft from which CDA are derived. Forcing previously-approved parts and repairs to go through the cumbersome SAR process costs government resources and wastes taxpayers’ money while ignoring the civil aviation sector’s outstanding safety and reliability record. Since SARs are rarely granted, DoD is not benefiting from the cost savings associated with PMA parts and DER repairs.

“By law, DoD has broad authority to make airworthiness determinations in any manner it chooses,” the submission said, citing Title 10 of the U.S. Code and a template from the Defense Logistics Agency. “Unfortunately, this department has translated this authority into an extraordinarily burdensome series of policies and instructions that require aircraft parts manufacturers and maintenance contractors – including those with Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) solutions already approved for use in civil aviation by the FAA – to go through a redundant, expensive, slow and burdensome SAR process to gain DoD approval.”

ARSA recommended the government revise its policies to trust its own aviation safety agency, the FAA. The association urged the White House to work with DoD to recognize “any approval issued by the FAA for a product, material, part, component, process or appliance as eligible for use on a CDA.”

To read the full ARSA submission, click here.

For more information regarding ARSA’s support for its members with military business, contact Executive Vice President Christian A. Klein (christian.klein@arsa.org).



More from ARSA

September SMS Webinar – Emergency Response Plans

On Tuesday, Sept. 29, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) will host the next session in their webinar series explaining integration of a safety management system within the operations…Read More

ARSA, AEA Seek Legally Supportable OpSpecs

On Sept. 10, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) continued their combined effort to limit use of “automatically” assigned operations specifications for repair station certificates. “The regulations are clear;…Read More

Seeking Time for D&A Implementation

On Sept. 10, ARSA and a coalition of industry allies petitioned the FAA to extend the compliance deadline for certain repair stations located outside the United States to institute drug…Read More

Online Training – HazMat Determinations

On Oct. 14, ARSA will present an online training session introducing the key definitions in 49 CFR tied to hazardous materials requirements for maintenance providers in 14 CFR. The level…Read More

Joint Comments Differentiate Between Authorization and Rating

On Sept. 1, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) jointly submitted comments to the FAA’s notice of proposed rulemaking to eliminate the need for a mechanic that holds an…Read More
ARSA