Join ARSA Ask ARSA Pay ARSA

GAO Again Misunderstands Foreign Repair Station Oversight

On July 28, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report reviewing the FAA’s oversight of foreign repair stations at the request of House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Ranking Member Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and House Aviation Subcommittee Ranking Member Rick Larsen (D-Wash.).

Unfortunately, Aviation Safety: FAA’s Risk-Based Oversight for Repair Stations Could Benefit from Additional Airline Data and Performance Metrics (GAO-16-679), is yet another attempt to scrutinize part 145 certificate holders located outside the United States to support false safety arguments (often leading to hostile legislation and ultimately unnecessary regulations).  Similar to past reports, the GAO once again alleged deficiencies in the FAA’s foreign repair station oversight, but didn’t find any specific violations or safety issues with contract maintenance providers.

Specifically, the GAO found that FAA inspectors were often unable to conduct unannounced inspections at foreign repair stations. ARSA has continually reminded lawmakers that international sovereignty prevents U.S. government officials from conducting “surprise” inspections (similar to “foreign” officials entering the United States without notice to the government). Furthermore, repair stations worldwide are safe and effective because good safety is good business, and no amount of “notice” will allow a maintenance provider to suddenly become compliant to satisfy an inspector. Non-compliance with safety regulations will be evident regardless of advance notice of a government inspection.

The GAO also specified that more data collection is required on the volume of work being done at these facilities in order to determine risk. It failed to connect the dots between global aviation safety, aircraft maintenance and the effort to build a truly “risk based” system. For contract maintenance providers and their customers, the reality is simple: Risk is not about volume of work, it’s about the type of work. Collecting more data may be useful, but only if the system is comprehensive enough to focus on the actual maintenance performed.

The report demonstrates that government auditors still fail to grasp the realities of the global aviation maintenance industry. While that is frustrating for business, to ARSA it is another opportunity to illustrate for the GAO, the Department of Transportation, the White House and even some stubborn members of Congress that they cannot fly safely without us.

For a GAO provided “highlight” document visit:  www.gao.gov/assets/680/678736.pdf

Previously from ARSA...

 



More from ARSA

2025 Annual Conference – It Happened

March 18-21, 2025 2025 Event Information | 2025 Sponsors Arlington, Virginia and Washington, D.C. with Livestream Options ARSA is grateful to the sponsors, participants, speakers, and support personnel who made the…Read More

Weston Award Recognizes Crowley’s Commitment to Learning

On March 20, ARSA recognized Jerry Crowley with its Leo Weston Award for Excellence in Government Service. Crowley is a long time FAA aviation safety inspector who was a professional…Read More

Industry Requests More Time to Comment on FAA Order 8130.21J

On March 28, ARSA joined 11 ally trade associations in requesting the FAA provide more time to comment on Draft Order 8130.21J, “Completion of FAA Form 8130-3 under Part 21.”…Read More

Small Biz Recruitment by Repair Stations

The National Skills Coalition and its partner organization Business Leaders United invite the repair station community to support a study of small and mid-sized business recruiting practices. The study seeks…Read More

Maintenance Industry Surpasses Pre-Pandemic Peaks, Enters “Supercycle”

On March 19, ARSA used its Annual Legislative Day gathering to release its 2025 Global Fleet & MRO Market Report. The analysis provided for the association by Oliver Wyman Vector,…Read More
ARSA