Huerta Likely to Remain Unconfirmed Through Election
August 07, 2012
Michael Huerta’s nomination to serve as FAA administrator will remain in limbo through the November elections.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) has vowed to block all executive branch appointments until after the polls close on November 6, voicing opposition to Huerta’s confirmation to serve as the agency’s chief. DeMint’s objection comes just days after the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee unanimously approved Huerta’s nomination. At the time of the committee’s approval, no senator had voiced opposition to Huerta.
While DeMint is the only senator to raise a public objection to Huerta’s nomination, it is probable another Republican senator would have put a hold on his confirmation prior to November. The position is a five-year term and GOP senators would prefer to wait for the outcome of the presidential election before confirming an FAA chief that would be able to serve through the first four years of a possible Romney administration.
~~~ posted 8/7/12 ~~~
More from ARSA
On Oct. 14, ARSA will present an online training session introducing the key definitions in 49 CFR tied to hazardous materials requirements for maintenance providers in 14 CFR. The level…
Read More
On Sept. 1, ARSA and the Aircraft Electronics Association (AEA) jointly submitted comments to the FAA’s notice of proposed rulemaking to eliminate the need for a mechanic that holds an…
Read More
On Aug. 26, ARSA completed the live series of online training sessions walking through every section of 14 CFR part 145, “Repair Stations.” The final session focused on the operating…
Read More
The recording of ARSA’s special workshop sharing the association’s method for understanding the aviation safety rules is now available on demand. The resource was presented to FAA personnel as part…
Read More
On Aug. 4, the FAA issued Information for Operators (InFO) 26012 explaining reporting requirements for part 121 air carriers that utilize foreign part 145 repair stations for “heavy maintenance.”
Sec.302(a)(1)(E)…
Read More